The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has challenged Sony Interactive Entertainment Network Europe Limited (Sony Europe) to a battle royale in the Australian Federal Court, alleging that Sony Europe made false or misleading representations to Australian consumers on its website and in dealings with Australian customers on its PlayStation online store. As you may be aware, the PlayStation home entertainment device (marketed under its “This is for the players” trademark) is one of the world’s most popular gaming devices, with an increasing presence online. But this matter is no game, and it is heading towards a lengthy legal battle.
What happened?
Sony Europe is responsible for the PlayStation Network Terms of Service that Australian consumers agree to when creating and using a PlayStation account online, and also operate the PlayStation Support Centre, which serves Australian consumers who experience issues with their PlayStation games.
The ACCC alleges that for the past two years, Sony Europe has told consumers seeking a refund for faulty games that it did not have to provide refunds for games that had been downloaded, or if 14 days had passed since purchase. The ACCC also alleges that Sony Europe told consumers it did not have to provide refunds unless the game developer told the consumer the game was irreparably faulty or otherwise authorised a refund and told consumers that in the event it did provide refunds, it could do so using virtual PlayStation currency instead of money.
These representations, the ACCC alleges, are in breach of the consumer guarantees set out in the Australian Consumer Law, which are not able to be excluded from any consumer terms.
Under the consumer guarantees in the Australian Consumer Law, consumers have the statutory right to a refund, repair or replacement if a product is faulty because it is not of acceptable quality, is not fit for purpose or does not match descriptions made by the businesses, depending on the seriousness of the fault. Limiting recourse to payment in PlayStation currency (i.e. a form of credit only useable or redeemable from the store of purchase) is similarly unacceptable.
Why is this case important?
The ACCC has previously established the enforceability of the Australian Consumer Law on overseas-based online retailers, in its action against US-based Valve Corporation, which was upheld by the High Court in 2018.
Whether a company is itself geo-located in Australia or not, the ACCC has consistently taken the view that if a business sells products into Australia then its business interactions with Australian consumers are subject to the Competition and Consumer Act, and the Australian Consumer Law, even if that business does not have any physical presence in Australia. This view has been upheld by the High Court, and the ACCC seeks to uphold the same with regard to Sony Europe and its consumer terms. If a business offers products to Australian consumers, Australia’s consumer laws apply.
The ACCC further seeks to make it clear that consumer guarantees on digital products do not expire after it has been downloaded, and refunds must be given in the form of original payment unless a consumer chooses to receive it in-store credit.
What does this mean for you?
If you are an online retailer, you must be aware that the Australian Consumer Law applies to all businesses that engage in trade and commerce with Australian consumers, including the supply of digital products such as games, and Australian consumers who buy digital products online will have the same rights as they would at a physical store.
These consumer guarantees cannot be excluded, therefore any trading terms and conditions need to take this into account and ensure that any non-excludable statutory guarantees are preserved for Australian customers. If you would like further information on the above and how it impacts on your business or your client’s business, or you need advice regarding the consumer guarantees on retailers or suppliers, please contact one of our experts below.
By Matt Hansen, Senior Associate
If you would like legal advice from Clint Fillipou, you can choose a Quick Match or browse Our Lawyers.
This article is was first published on Anisimoff Legal
This article does not constitute legal advice or a legal opinion on any matter discussed and, accordingly, it should not be relied upon. It should not be regarded as a comprehensive statement of the law and practice in this area. If you require any advice or information, please speak to practising lawyer in your jurisdiction. No individual who is a member, partner, shareholder or consultant of, in or to any constituent part of Legally Yours Pty Ltd accepts or assumes responsibility, or has any liability, to any person in respect of this article.
